Peer Review Process

PEER-REVIEW POLICY

All manuscripts submitted to the JURISTA journal must comply with the journal's aims and scope and author guidelines. The submitted manuscripts must demonstrate scientific distinction or novelty appropriate to their aims and scope. All manuscripts must avoid plagiarism. All authors are required to use plagiarism detection software to check for similarity; using Turnitin is recommended. In the JURISTA journal, editors have checked for plagiarism using the Turnitin software. The research article submitted to this journal will be peer-reviewed by at least 2 (two) or more expert reviewers, having an outstanding reputation in their field. JURISTA journal has ensured that all reviewers have no conflicts of interest. The reviewers have provided a fairly scientific statement to improve the manuscript's quality and have also stated, objectively, whether the manuscript can be published with major/minor revisions or rejected. The type of review is an international, double-blind, peer-reviewed journal. The final decision on article acceptance will be made by the Editors based on the reviewers’ comments. Publication of accepted articles and the sequence of published articles will be made by the Editor-in-Chief. The sequence of consideration, the geographical distribution of authors, and the thematic issue are among the main reasons for publication. The submitted manuscript will be reviewed within 4 (four months) of the submission date, based on the reviewers’ feedback, and the reviewed manuscript will be treated confidentially and fairly prior to publication.

The JURISTA Journal employs a double-blind peer-review system to ensure the quality, integrity, and objectivity of the publication process. In this system, both the authors’ and reviewers’ identities are concealed throughout the review process.

To maintain the confidentiality and impartiality of the review process, the journal does not publish the list of reviewers on its website. This policy is intended to protect reviewer anonymity and uphold the highest standards of academic ethics.